Delaware State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,740  Hasan Gill FR 37:16
2,959  Burgess Cameron FR 39:04
3,022  Seth Danjoint SO 40:21
3,038  Hanqaamo Lintiso FR 40:48
3,057  Gerald Amobi FR 41:47
3,075  Andrew Chambers SO 42:53
3,081  Imontae Parker FR 43:20
3,091  Krystofer Ringgold SO 43:49
3,095  Robert Castillo FR 43:59
National Rank #303 of 312
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #30 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Hasan Gill Burgess Cameron Seth Danjoint Hanqaamo Lintiso Gerald Amobi Andrew Chambers Imontae Parker Krystofer Ringgold Robert Castillo
UMES Cappy Anderson Invitational 09/17 1909 38:15 39:25 40:41 43:25 44:47 45:26 44:50 59:59
DSU Farm Run Invite 09/24 1706 36:59 38:09 39:24 40:36 41:22 41:45 44:13 41:35
DSU-Pre Conference Run Invite 10/15 1754 37:02 38:55 41:14 40:26 41:13 42:38 42:29 43:45 41:39
MEAC Championship 10/29 1752 37:13 39:34 39:42 40:32 41:43 43:17 43:02 44:26





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.9 1016 6.6 93.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hasan Gill 186.8
Burgess Cameron 200.6
Seth Danjoint 206.1
Hanqaamo Lintiso 208.6
Gerald Amobi 211.4
Andrew Chambers 213.6
Imontae Parker 215.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 6.6% 6.6 30
31 93.5% 93.5 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0